Sam McEwin and Dean Millson are the hosts of the Brandwidth podcast. They are marketing and branding experts who bring their knowledge and insights to the show.

Summary: Sam and Dean discuss the power of visual assets in marketing and branding. They reference a chart from Ipsos that ranks different visual assets based on their effectiveness in grabbing attention. They highlight the importance of using visual assets beyond just a brand name in ads. They also discuss the effectiveness of jingles, characters, and celebrities in advertising. They emphasize the need for distinctive visual assets that can be easily recognized and associated with a brand.

Key Takeaways:

  • Visual assets, such as logos and slogans, make ads more effective than just talking about a brand.
  • Characters are highly effective visual assets that can be owned by a brand and evolve with the brand’s creative style.
  • Sonic brand cues, such as jingles, are underutilized but have a significant impact on brand recognition and recall.
  • Celebrities can be effective visual assets, but they can switch brands and do not provide the same level of ownership as characters.

Quotes:

  • “Visual assets beyond just a brand name in an ad make it more effective.”
  • “Characters are highly effective visual assets that can be owned by a brand and evolve with the brand’s creative style.”
  • “Sonic brand cues, like jingles, are underutilized but have a significant impact on brand recognition and recall.”
  • “Celebrities can be effective visual assets, but they can switch brands and do not provide the same level of ownership as characters.”

TimestampSummary
0:28Introduction to the podcast episode
2:05Discussion on the tendency to focus on doom and gloom
3:49Explanation of the podcast format
4:36Introduction to the chart on visual assets
6:20Effectiveness of logos and slogans in ads
7:10Example of an ad without branding
8:51Discussion on attention and QR codes
9:29Mention of McDonald’s unbranded campaign
10:31Introduction to distinctive visual assets
10:39McDonald’s jingle and distinctive assets in ads
10:31McDonald’s made a distinctive asset with their Big Mac jingle.
10:49Market leaders like McDonald’s don’t need a logo if their distinctive assets are strong enough.
11:12Heinz’s tomato sauce ad looked like a Heinz ad even though it wasn’t.
12:15Sonic brand cues are underutilized but highly effective.
13:21Characters and celebrities are powerful assets but not cool.
16:13People don’t deeply engage with brands or want a brand relationship.
18:51Characters are more effective than celebrities.
19:17Characters can be owned, celebrities can switch brands.
19:46Kanye West switched sneaker brands from Nike to Adidas.
21:01Colonel Sanders is a character who represents KFC, not McDonald’s.
21:01Discussion about Colonel Sanders and the KFC brand
21:57Talking about creating brand assets and characters
23:01Conversation about the effectiveness of influencer marketing
24:38Sam’s experience with influencer marketing and a billboard
26:26Influencer marketing as a way to prime consumer interest
28:35Using celebrities and characters as brand assets
29:37Branded characters offer flexibility and storytelling opportunities
30:48Discussion about the malleability of brand characters
31:08The effectiveness of uncool branding elements
31:50Wrap up and mention of potential podcast character
31:48Discussion about needing a character for the podcast
32:00Mention of Salesforce and their use of characters
32:26Mention of the successful execution of the Meerkat character
33:30Discussion on whether characters can be human or animated
34:02Explanation of how brand assets and characters work
34:38Examples of ads with characters that become the brand
35:40Mention of Flight Centre and Amy as characters
36:19Speculation on the future use of characters in ads
37:01Discussion on the effectiveness of characters in ads
38:14Conclusion and invitation for audience to share character examples

Leave a Reply